{"id":"pod_polito_vanessa_2024-10-25T22:44:51.606Z","submitter":"","author":"Elizabeth C Butler [NOAA/Space Weather Prediction Center] Adam F Kowalski [National Solar Observatory; University of Colorado Boulder]","status":"published","creation-date":"2024-10-25T22:44:51.609Z","last-modified-date":"2024-11-08T06:03:44.572Z","credit":"","title":"Decay Timescales of Chromospheric Condensations in Solar Flare Footpoints","contentBlocks":[{"type":"text","text":"Chromospheric%20condensations%20%28CCs%29%20are%20a%20prominent%20feature%20of%20flare%20footpoint%20heating%20in%20the%20solar%20flare%20standard%20model.%20Fisher%20%281989%29%20derived%20analytic%20expressions%20for%20the%20CC%E2%80%99s%20dynamics%20from%20assumptions%20surrounding%20the%20driving%20pressure%20gradient%20and%20initial%20energy%20deposition.%20The%20most%20cited%20of%20these%20is%20the%20lifetime%20for%20the%20CC%27s%20decay%2C%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Blife%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D.%20For%20reasonable%20assumptions%20of%20both%20thermal%20and%20nonthermal%20heating%2C%20Fisher%20found%20tlife%20%7E%2054%E2%80%9376%20s%2C%20indicating%20that%20a%201%20minute%20lifetime%20is%20largely%20independent%20from%20the%20heating%20input.%20Not%20as%20cited%20is%20the%20CC%E2%80%99s%20half-life%2C%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2C%20which%20is%20tied%20to%20local%20atmospheric%20properties%20in%20a%20much%20more%20intuitive%20manner%2C%20making%20it%20a%20potentially%20useful%20probe%20of%20the%20flare%20chromosphere%20and%20may%20be%20easier%20to%20obtain%20in%20most%20observations.%20These%20timescales%20are%20rarely%20the%20main%20analysis%20for%20most%20observational%20studies%2C%20so%20whether%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Blife%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20%7E%201%20min%2C%20and%20its%20implications%2C%20is%20quantitatively%20common%20is%20still%20an%20open%20question.%0A%0AIn%20this%20study%20%28Butler%20%26amp%3B%20Kowalski%202024%29%2C%20we%20calculated%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Blife%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20%28via%20the%20proxy%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Bdetect%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%29%20and%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20from%20the%20Doppler%20shift%20time%20series%20of%20two%20chromospheric%20flare%20lines%20in%20IRIS%20footpoint%20pixels%20to%20%28a%29%20begin%20developing%20a%20sense%20of%20the%20quantities%E2%80%99%20general%20tendencies%20and%20%28b%29%20examine%20their%20correlation%20with%20the%20CC%E2%80%99s%20maximum%20velocity%2C%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2C%20as%20a%20test%20of%20whether%20or%20not%20they%20are%20truly%20independent%20of%20flare%20heating%2C%20given%20that%20Fisher%20%281989%29%20had%20also%20demonstrated%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20was%20proportional%20to%20the%20deposited%20energy%20flux.%20%0A%0AThe%20emission%20lines%20examined%20were%20Mg%20II%202791.6%20%26Aring%3B%20and%20Fe%20II%202814.445%20%26Aring%3B%2C%20as%20neither%20saturates%20in%20IRIS%20flare%20data%20and%20their%20formation%20requirements%20allow%20us%20to%20probe%20a%20semicontinuous%20atmospheric%20column%2C%20enabling%20a%20more%20nuanced%20examination%20of%20the%20CC%20decay.%20Figure%201%20shows%20their%20line%20profiles%20from%20a%20representative%20footpoint%20pixel%20from%20SOL2014-09-10T17%3A45%20%28X1.6%29%2C%20with%20Gaussian%20fits%20and%20calculated%20Doppler%20shifts.%20Figure%202%20shows%20the%20aggregated%20timescales%20for%20both%20lines%20as%20functions%20of%20measurement%20method%20%28left%29%20and%20of%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20%28right%29%3A%20measured%20%E2%80%98straight%E2%80%99%20from%20the%20data%20with%20the%20observational%20cadence%20and%20measured%20from%20%E2%80%98interpolated%E2%80%99%20data%20as%20a%20potential%20counter%20for%20cadence%20variation."},{"type":"image","file":"","url":"nuggetvideos/2024/10/25/pod_polito_vanessa_2024-10-25T22%3A44%3A51.606Z/Fig1.png","hash":"9e0a841c5f04e59014862002017163b2","mimeType":"image/png","caption":"Figure%201.%20Spectra%20time%20series%20with%20Gaussian%20%EF%AC%81ts%20from%20a%20footpoint%20pixel%20in%20an%20X1.6%20flare%20from%2010%20September%202014%2C%20step%20cadence%20%3D%209.4%20s%2C%20title%20%3D%20timestamp.%20The%20black%20stepped%20line%20is%20observational%20data.%20For%20double%20%EF%AC%81ts%2C%20the%20solid%20purple%20is%20the%20total%20%EF%AC%81t%2C%20the%20dashed%20blue%20line%20is%20the%20rest%20component%2C%20and%20the%20dashed%20red%20line%20is%20the%20red%20component%2C%20with%20the%20vertical%20dotted%20red%20line%20marking%20the%20Doppler%20shift.%20For%20single%20%EF%AC%81ts%2C%20the%20solid%20purple%20line%20is%20the%20Gaussian%20%EF%AC%81t%2C%20with%20a%20vertical%20dotted%20purple%20line%20marking%20the%20Doppler%20shift.%20The%20vertical%20gray%20line%20is%20the%20rest%20wavelength.%20Left%3A%20Mg%20II%20data.%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20occurred%20at%20timestamp%202313%3B%20timestamps%202321%20and%202322%20are%20the%20only%20single%20%EF%AC%81ts.%20Right%3A%20Fe%20II%20data.%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20occurred%20at%20timestamp%202314%3B%20timestamps%202314%E2%80%932317%20are%20the%20only%20double%20%EF%AC%81ts.%20Note%20that%20the%20Fe%20II%20time%20series%20starts%20one%20timestamp%20later%2C%20due%20to%20increased%20noise%20inhibiting%20%EF%AC%81tting."},{"type":"image","file":"","url":"nuggetvideos/2024/10/25/pod_polito_vanessa_2024-10-25T22%3A44%3A51.606Z/Fig2.png","hash":"cda22d265c6ae15ab3516108358e3936","mimeType":"image/png","caption":"Figure%202.%20Left%3A%20Straight%20vs.%20interpolated%20timescales%20for%20both%20emission%20lines.%20A%201%3A1%20line%20is%20plotted%20for%20reference%2C%20indicating%20that%20while%20the%20interpolated%20values%20may%20be%20more%20precise%2C%20the%20observations%20overall%20largely%20have%20sufficient%20temporal%20resolution%20to%20resolve%20the%20timescales.%20Horizontal%20arrows%20mark%20lower%20%28rightward%20arrow%29%20and%20upper%20limits%20%28leftward%20arrow%29%20of%20the%20interpolated%20values.%20The%20length%20of%20the%20arrow%20has%20no%20physical%20meaning%3B%20it%20was%20chosen%20merely%20to%20be%20visible.%20The%20gray%20bars%20in%20the%20right%20panels%20mark%20the%20Fisher%20%281989%29%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Blife%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20range%20on%20both%20axes.%20The%20red%20thin%20diamond%20marks%20the%20means%20with%20standard%20deviation%20error%20bars%3B%20the%20pink%20thick%20diamond%20marks%20the%20medians.%20Right%3A%20Timescales%20vs%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D.%20Mg%20II%20is%20plotted%20as%20blue%20circles%20and%20Fe%20II%20as%20green%20triangles.%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20and%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Bdetect%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20are%20plotted%20on%20the%20left%20and%20right%20columns%2C%20respectively%2C%20with%20the%20straight%20and%20interpolated%20values%20in%20the%20top%20and%20bottom%20rows.%20Left%20column%3A%20exponential%20decay%20fits%20to%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2C%20minus%20the%20Mg%20II%20points%20%26lt%3B20%20km%20s%E2%88%921%20%2C%20are%20plotted%20in%20the%20same%20color%20as%20their%20associated%20data%2C%20with%20the%20data%E2%80%99s%20correlation%20coefficients%20and%20fit%20equations%20listed%20in%20the%20same%20colors.%20In%20the%20interpolation%20plot%2C%20dashed%20lines%20mark%20the%20fits%20to%20the%20straight%20data%20for%20comparison.%20Right%20column%3A%20linear%20fits%20to%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Bdetect%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2C%20minus%20the%20outliers%2C%20are%20plotted%20as%20a%20solid%20line%2C%20with%20the%20data%E2%80%99s%20correlation%20coefficients%20and%20fit%20equations%20listed."},{"type":"text","text":"Half%20of%20the%20Mg%20II%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Bdetect%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20points%20fall%20within%20Fisher%E2%80%99s%2054%E2%80%9376%20s%20range.%20Conversely%2C%20Fe%20II%20rarely%20falls%20within%20it%2C%20indicating%20that%20while%20the%20%E2%80%9C1%20minute%20lifetime%E2%80%9D%20is%20common%20enough%20for%20use%20as%20a%20benchmark%2C%20it%20has%20a%20line%20dependence%20and%20perhaps%20should%20not%20be%20used%20a%20strict%20reality%20check.%20Both%20emission%20lines%20tend%20to%20have%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2%7D%20%5Cleq%20%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2040%20s%2C%20with%20Fe%20II%20clustered%20at%20lower%20values.%20Fe%20II%E2%80%99s%20timescales%20being%20generally%20smaller%20supports%20the%20scenario%20that%20it%E2%80%99s%20sampling%20the%20CC%20at%20a%20later%20time%20than%20Mg%20II.%20Both%20emission%20lines%20show%20a%20strong%20correlation%20between%20the%20timescales%2C%20generally%20clustering%20around%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Bdetect%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20%7E%202%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2t%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D.%20This%20indicates%20that%20if%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Bdetect%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20is%20unable%20to%20be%20observed%2C%20it%20can%20be%20estimated%20from%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2C%20with%202%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20serving%20as%20an%20approximate%20value%20%EF%AC%82oor.%0A%0AIn%20a%20given%20kernel%2C%20Mg%20II%20vmax%20%26gt%3B%20Fe%20II%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2C%20with%20Mg%20II%20reaching%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20first.%20Both%20are%20again%20consistent%20with%20the%20interpretation%20of%20Mg%20II%20sampling%20the%20CC%20at%20an%20earlier%20time.%20The%20right%20of%20Figure%202%20plots%20these%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20as%20a%20function%20of%20timescale.%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Bdetect%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20does%20show%20an%20overall%20positive%20correlation%20with%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D.%20If%20we%20take%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20as%20a%20proxy%20for%20the%20kernel%CA%BCs%20energy%20deposition%20%28from%20Fisher%E2%80%99s%20proportionality%29%2C%20then%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Bdetect%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2C%20as%20an%20observational%20proxy%20for%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7Blife%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2C%20is%20not%20independent%20of%20how%20the%20kernel%20is%20heated%3A%20the%20more%20energy%20injected%2C%20the%20longer%20the%20CC%20takes%20to%20lose%20it.%20%0A%0ATo%20first%20order%2C%20this%20correlation%20appears%20reversed%20for%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2C%20with%20exponential%20decays%20appearing%20to%20approximate%20the%20straight%20data%20decently%20well.%20Faster%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%20results%20in%20a%20shorter%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D%2C%20most%20clearly%20in%20the%20Fe%20II%20data%2C%20indicating%20that%20kinetic%20energy%20loss%20might%20be%20more%20efficient%20in%20the%20first%20half%20of%20the%20CC%20decay.%20This%20is%20consistent%20with%20Fisher%CA%BCs%20%281989%29%20prediction%20of%20%5Cbegin%7Bequation%7Dt_%7B1%2F2%7D%20%5Cpropto%201%2Fv_%7Bmax%7D%5Cend%7Bequation%7D.%0A%0AFor%20both%20lines%2C%20%7E90%25%20of%20the%20sample%20had%20an%20observable%20acceleration%20phase%2C%20such%20as%20can%20be%20seen%20in%20Figure%201.%20On%20average%2C%20acceleration%20took%20%E2%88%BC38%20s%20for%20Mg%20II%20and%20%E2%88%BC23%20s%20for%20Fe%20II.%20Along%20with%20a%20shorter%20acceleration%20time%2C%20Fe%20II%20also%20tends%20toward%20slower%20acceleration%20rates%2C%20which%20matches%20its%20slower%20vmax.%20Observations%20of%20down%EF%AC%82ow%20acceleration%20could%20be%20a%20powerful%20constraint%20and%20diagnostic%20for%20%EF%AC%82are%20radiative%20hydrodynamic%20%28RHD%29%20models%2C%20as%20many%20currently%20do%20not%20exhibit%20acceleration%20phases%2C%20or%20they%20are%20much%20too%20short.%20%0A%0AAdditionally%2C%20these%20accelerations%20could%20potentially%20be%20used%20to%20calculate%20various%20CC%20kinematics%2C%20e.g.%2C%20the%20initial%20column%20mass%20accelerated%20by%20the%20pressure%20gradient%2C%20using%20reasonable%20estimates%20of%20the%20pressure%20differential%20from%20the%20transition%20region%20to%20the%20upper%20chromosphere%20of%20the%20footpoint%2C%20and%20the%20relative%20growth%20of%20that%20mass.%20Such%20values%20could%20be%20directly%20compared%20with%20atmospheric%20data%20from%20%EF%AC%82are%20RHD%20models."}],"references":["<a href=\"https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...970...33B/abstract\">Butler, EC & Kowalski, AF 2024 ApJ 970 33</a>","<a href=\"https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...346.1019F/abstract\">Fisher, G. 1989, ApJ, 346, 1019</a>","","","","","","","",""],"pubDate":"2024-11-14T00:25:12.796Z"}